HEDGING AS DISCOURSE STRATEGY IN MARRIAGE AND LAND DISPUTE IN ANAMBRA STATE

Abstract

The study examined the hedging as a discourse strategy in resolving conflicts, particularly in the contexts of marriage disputes and land disputes in Achina, Aguata Local Government Area, Anambra state. The main aim of this study is therefore, to examine these discourse strategy in resolving conflicts. The study made use of descriptive research design method. Structured questionnaire was used for data collection. 250 respondents were sampled in the study area. Mean rating was used for data analysis. The findings of the study showed that modal verbs and expressions of probability, conditional statements, indirect speech and reported speech, diplomatic and polite language and use of proverbs and metaphors are the types of hedging strategies used in managing land dispute discourse; hedging strategies have impact on conflict resolution in Achina, Aguata Local Government Area and that the cultural and socio-economic factors have influence on hedging strategies. The study concluded that hedging is a double-edged sword in dispute resolution, offering both advantages in conflict management and challenges in clarity. Its effective use requires a balance between maintaining flexibility and ensuring that issues are resolved in a timely and definitive manner. Based on the findings, the study suggested that to compare hedging strategies used in marriage disputes versus land disputes across different communities in Anambra State or other Nigerian states.